Authors

  • Julian Savulescu
    Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics Director, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Mark Sheehan
    James Martin Research Fellow, Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, University of Oxford
  • Peter Taylor
    Research Associate, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
  • Anders Sandberg
    James Martin Research Fellow, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
  • Guy Kahane
    Deputy Director, Oxford Uehrio Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Toby Ord
    Research Associate, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Dominic Wilkinson
    DPhil Student, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Rebecca Roache
    James Martin Research Fellow, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
  • S. Matthew Liao
    Deputy Director, and James Martin Senior Research Fellow, Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, University of Oxford
  • Steve Clarke
    James Martin Research Fellow, Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, University of Oxford
  • Neil Levy
    James Martin Research Fellow, Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, University of Oxford
  • Tom Douglas
    DPhil Student, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Rafaela Hillerbrand
    James Martin Research Fellow, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
  • Luciano Floridi
    Research Chair in Philosophy of Information, Department of Philosophy, University of Hertfordshire and Fellow of St Cross College, University of Oxford
  • Janet Radcliffe Richards
    Distinguished Research Fellow, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Nick Bostrom
    Director, Oxford Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
  • Lachlan de Crespigny
    Principal Fellow, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne; Honorary Fellow, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Research Associate, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics
  • Roger Crisp
    Uehiro Fellow, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Barbro Fröding nee Bjorkman
    Marie Curie Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Francesca Minerva
    Visiting Student, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • David Edmonds
    Research Associate, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Pablo Stafforini
    DPhil Student, Oxford Centre for Neuroethics, University of Oxford
  • Alexandre Erler
    Dphil Student, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Russell Powell
    Research Fellow, Science and Religious Conflict, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford

Cited By

  • Intute Logo

Recommend this site

News Feeds

Blog powered by TypePad

« The Dignity of the Carrot | Main | Football screens and genes: Should genetic discrimination in sport be banned? »

April 25, 2008

New hope or false hope for vegetative patients?

A BBC documentary screening this evening on the ‘Inside Out’ program reports on what it describes as a breakthrough for patients in a vegetative state. It is based upon research by a group of neuroscientists in Cambridge, who have used sophisticated brain scans (functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)) to look for signs of consciousness in patients who have previously been thought to be completely unaware of their surroundings.

The term “vegetative state” refers to patients who have suffered severe brain damage for example from lack of oxygen, or severe head injury, and have been in a coma. Such patients may wake from their coma, and be able to breathe for themselves (without an artificial respirator) but they show no signs of responding to external stimuli. They do not appear to hear voices, or to recognise the faces of those around them. They do not communicate. They have reflex responses, but do not appear to feel pain. The lights are on, but as far as we can tell, noone is home.

The Cambridge researchers have used fMRI to try to understand what is happening in the brains of patients in a vegetative state. They have reported that in some of these patients at least, their brains light up in response to hearing voices. In two patients they saw patterns on the brain scans that they believe indicate that those patients were able to obey instructions. The researchers claim that their findings indicate that “a patient that looked vegetative clinically was in fact entirely aware”.

However there are good reasons to be cautious in interpreting these results. Firstly, despite the claims of the scientists, it is not yet clear that they have demonstrated awareness in patients in a vegetative state. A wide range of brain responses can occur automatically and unconsciously, as evidenced by studies of patients who are asleep or under anaesthetic. These responses could be a type of brain reflex. Secondly, only a minority of patients that have been studied so far have shown the types of brain patterns that the scientists think reflect awareness. It may be only occasional or rare patients in a vegetative state who have this sort of response. Thirdly, it is not clear that these findings provide hope for patients or their families. Although the two patients who showed this brain response subsequently had some clinical improvement, the extent of their improvement was very small. They reached a state of severe disability known as a “minimal conscious state”. (And one of them has subsequently relapsed.) Finally, and perhaps most importantly, these patients may be in a far worse state if they are actually aware. If a patient in a vegetative state is completely unaware (as we have previously believed to be uniformly the case), we can at least be sure that they are not suffering. But if brain scans reveal that some of these patients are intermittently aware, they may well be in pain, frightened, confused and depressed. But they would have no way of telling us, or doing anything about it.

It remains to be seen whether the BBC documentary provides a balanced perspective on this research. However there is a real risk that it will provide false hope to the loved ones of patients with devastating brain injury.

Links
New hope for ‘vegetative patients BBC 25/4/08

Detecting awareness in the vegetative state Science 2006

Functional Neuroimaging in the vegetative state Nature Reviews Neurosciences 2008

The light's on, but is anybody home? Richard Burton Salon.com 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54f10e06f883400e5521218f98834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New hope or false hope for vegetative patients?:

Comments

For those who are interested (and who are in the UK in the next 6 days), you can watch the Inside Out program by going to http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/page/item/b00b24nv.shtml?q=inside+out&start=1&scope=iplayersearch&go=Find+Programmes&version_pid=b00b24jb

My concerns about the program's reporting of Adrian Owen's research were borne out.
They present the case-story of a patient who suffered a brain-stem stroke, and who was diagnosed as being locked-in shortly afterwards on the basis of preserved eye-movements.
The program implies that the Cambridge group's research may be used to identify hundreds or thousands of patients in a vegetative state who have been misdiagnosed. However the case discussed in the program was not identified by fMRI scanning, but on the basis of observable behaviour. It is not clear that she was ever diagnosed as being in a vegetative state.
The researchers speculate that some patients who have been diagnosed as being in a vegetative state are actually fully locked-in. If they are able to use fMRI to communicate with such patients, that will put paid to remaining doubts about the significance of their findings. It will also allow the wishes of such patients to be known (but only for the brief periods when they are in an MRI scanner).

In the meantime, the hyperbole about "new hope" is likely to lead to multiple requests for functional neuroimaging for patients who have sustained severe brain injury, without any evidence that such scanning will provide them with benefit.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Search

  • Google Search

    WWW
    practicalethicsnews.com

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner