Authors

  • Julian Savulescu
    Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics Director, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Mark Sheehan
    James Martin Research Fellow, Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, University of Oxford
  • Peter Taylor
    Research Associate, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
  • Anders Sandberg
    James Martin Research Fellow, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
  • Guy Kahane
    Deputy Director, Oxford Uehrio Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Toby Ord
    Research Associate, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Dominic Wilkinson
    DPhil Student, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Rebecca Roache
    James Martin Research Fellow, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
  • S. Matthew Liao
    Deputy Director, and James Martin Senior Research Fellow, Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, University of Oxford
  • Steve Clarke
    James Martin Research Fellow, Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, University of Oxford
  • Neil Levy
    James Martin Research Fellow, Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, University of Oxford
  • Tom Douglas
    DPhil Student, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Rafaela Hillerbrand
    James Martin Research Fellow, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
  • Luciano Floridi
    Research Chair in Philosophy of Information, Department of Philosophy, University of Hertfordshire and Fellow of St Cross College, University of Oxford
  • Janet Radcliffe Richards
    Distinguished Research Fellow, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
  • Nick Bostrom
    Director, Oxford Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
  • Lachlan de Crespigny
    Principal Fellow, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne; Honorary Fellow, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Research Associate, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics
  • Roger Crisp
    Uehiro Fellow

Cited By

  • Intute Logo

Recommend this site

News Feeds

Blog powered by TypePad

« A Pipeline to Truth? Fighting Absenteeism with Voice Analysis | Main | The Ethics of 'Human Admixed Embryos': Concerns and Responses »

May 16, 2008

A Second Human Singularity?

New Scientist reports this week claims that the reason human cognitive powers are so superior to those of other animals has to do not with biology alone, but also with our ability to interact with others and with the world.

Several researchers who hold this view contributed to ‘The Sapient Mind’, a recent publication by the Royal Society. They claim that the biology of the human brain stopped changing 60,000 to 70,000 years ago, after which other factors dominated the development of our mental powers. The key factor was the recognition that other creatures have minds, which—along with an increasing working memory—meant that humans became vastly more capable than other animals of learning and teaching others. This new ability to learn paved the way for the development of cultures and an increasing body of knowledge. As cultures developed and knowledge amassed, people were able to assimilate more—and more sophisticated—information. Doing so can literally change the brain: one of the most well-known examples of this is the way in which the brains of London taxi drivers change as they memorise the street map of London (1).

It is interesting to compare this story of the development of the human mind with the concept of a singularity, familiar from discussions of artificial intelligence. Some thinkers believe that, as artificial intelligence grows more sophisticated, there will come a point in the future at which artificial intelligence becomes capable of improving itself far more quickly than its human creators could ever do. This would lead to a 'singularity': an explosion of intelligence, as self-improvements in artificial intelligence enable further self-improvements, and so on. The effects of this could transform the world we live in, for better or worse.

If the view of the human mind held by some of the researchers published in ‘The Sapient Mind’ is correct, we might see human development as having had its own singularity. With the right biological foundations laid, the relatively modest realisation that other creatures are intelligent set in place a series of improvements which led to the often spectacular sophistication of today’s human intelligence.

What does the future hold for human intelligence?  There is currently much discussion about cognitive enhancement.  Various promising possibilities exist to improve pharmacologically our ability to remember, concentrate, stay awake, understand, and reason (2).  It is easy to see how improvements in such abilities might make life better: the recent popularity of computer games that promise to improve cognitive abilities demonstrates how eager people are to improve their minds.  What is less obvious, however, is that such improvements could mark only the beginning. If our minds can develop in the future in much the same way as—according to some—they have done in the past, improvements in certain biological capacities could lay the groundwork for far more impressive developments.  Just as our distant ancestors' realisation that others have minds played a key role in the development of the minds that humans have today, pharmacological improvement in our cognitive capacities could enable us to make insights—perhaps relatively modest insights—that lead to further improvements that, today, we may barely be able to conceive.

 

References

(1) Maguire, E.A., D.G. Gadian, I.S. Johnsrude, C.D. Good, J. Ashburner, R.S.J. Frackowiak, and C.D. Frith (2000) ‘Navigation-Related Structural Change in the Hippocampi of Taxi Drivers’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97/8: 4398-4403.

(2) Bostrom, N. and Sandberg, A. (2007) ‘Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges’, Science and Engineering Ethics.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2704462/29147788

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Second Human Singularity?:

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search

  • Google Search

    WWW
    practicalethicsnews.com

August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner